Close

Electronic Contracts

The digital age has revolutionized how agreements are formed and executed. Electronic contracts (e-contracts) have become a cornerstone of modern commerce and enabled parties to enter into legally-binding agreements without physical presence or paperwork. Central to the enforceability and legality of these contracts are legislative frameworks like the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) and Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA).

What are electronic contracts?

An electronic contract is a legally enforceable agreement created and signed in electronic form. Common examples include click-wrap agreements (such as "I Agree" checkboxes), email exchanges with contractual terms, and digital signatures on formal documents.

Key Features of Electronic Contracts
  1. Digital Formation: Terms and agreements are offered, negotiated, and accepted online.
  2. Electronic Signatures: Signatures are often executed digitally, through methods such as typed names, scanned handwritten signatures, or digital signature technologies.
  3. Automation: Many e-contracts are created and executed without human intervention, such as in the case of smart contracts.
The Role of the ESIGN Act

The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) was enacted in 2000 to provide a federal framework for the use of electronic signatures and records in commerce.

Key Provisions
  1. Legal Recognition: The ESIGN Act ensures that electronic signatures and records have the same legal effect as their paper counterparts.
  2. Consent Requirement: Parties must consent to conduct business electronically, ensuring that all parties understand and agree to the digital nature of the transaction.
  3. Accessibility: Records must be accessible to all parties in a manner that allows them to retain and reproduce the information.
  4. Exclusions: Certain documents, such as wills, trusts, and family law documents, are excluded from the ESIGN Act's provisions.

In short, the ESIGN Act removed barriers to e-commerce, allowing businesses and consumers to transact efficiently across the United States.

Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA)

The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) is a state-level framework designed to standardize the treatment of electronic records and signatures across states. UETA, adopted by 49 U.S. states, predates the ESIGN Act and provides complementary guidelines.

Key Principles
  1. Parity with Paper: An electronic signature or record is not denied legal effect solely because it is in electronic form.
  2. Party Autonomy: The use of electronic records and signatures is voluntary, and both parties must agree to their use.
  3. Attribution and Authority: Electronic signatures are attributed to the person responsible for them, ensuring accountability.
  4. Uniformity Across Jurisdictions: UETA aims to harmonize electronic transaction laws, minimizing interstate discrepancies.
Key Differences from the ESIGN Act
  • UETA applies to intrastate transactions, while the ESIGN Act governs interstate and international commerce.
  • UETA is adopted by states, and each state may have slight variations in its implementation.
Interplay Between the ESIGN Act and UETA

The ESIGN Act and UETA work together to provide a cohesive legal framework for electronic contracts. Where UETA has been enacted, it typically governs electronic transactions within the state, with the ESIGN Act acting as a fallback in jurisdictions without UETA.

Advantages of Electronic Contracts
  1. Efficiency: Electronic contracts reduce the time and resources required for negotiations, signing, and storage.
  2. Global Reach: Parties can enter into agreements across borders without physical interaction.
  3. Auditability: Digital trails enhance transparency and accountability.
  4. Sustainability: Reduced reliance on paper contributes to environmental conservation.

Generally, an agreement (i.e., a contract) is created when there is an understanding and acquiescence regarding the terms and conditions between the respective parties. There must be an offer, acceptance and consideration. As such, an electronic contract is formalized when the parties (i.e., two individuals or entities) show their consent to the material terms, which are memorialized in a written document. The consent can be either express or implied. For example, it is express when the user enters his/her name in the "I Agree" button on the website. It can also be implied if the user continues to use the website with the understanding that by using the website he/she has accepted its terms and conditions. A user agreement, terms of service, or terms of use, is provided to website visitors to provide the ground rules for website access and usage. They generally contain terms and conditions which reduce the website owner's exposure to liability. In today's high-tech world, most of the disputes relate to whether there was contract formation. Stated otherwise, was the other side properly notified of the terms and conditions of the agreement?

A user agreement, terms of service, or terms of use, is provided to website visitors to outline the ground rules for website access and usage. They generally contain terms and conditions, which reduce the website owner's exposure to liability. The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ("UETA") is one of the uniform acts which was proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws ("NCCUSL"). Its main purpose is to provide a universal body of law to the states related to the validity of electronic contracts as a viable medium of agreement. The State of California has incorporated this act in Civil Code sections 1633.1 et seq. This law defines an "electronic record" as an enforceable writing which a court may review to ascertain the terms of an agreement between contracting parties. This statute defines an "electronic record" as information which is created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored electronically. It seems to include e-mails, website terms and conditions, license agreements contained in a software installation program, and purchase orders as enforceable agreements. The readers must be advised that the UETA includes a list of transactions that are not covered by its terms. Stated otherwise, there are certain transactions which will not be given legal effect if finalized electronically. Obviously, providing a comprehensive list would be lengthy. Nevertheless, the following items should provide a better understanding of the types of excluded transactions:

  1. Wills, codicils or testamentary trusts
  2. Transactions involving negotiable instruments
  3. Bank lending transactions
  4. Foreclosure and eviction notices
  5. Consumer matters (e.g., credit reporting, and medical information release forms)
What are the challenges and considerations?
  1. Authentication and Security: Ensuring the authenticity of parties and the integrity of the document is critical.
  2. Jurisdictional Issues: Cross-border agreements may involve conflicting laws or standards.
  3. Exclusions: Not all transactions can be conducted electronically under current laws.
Future of Electronic Contracts

As technology evolves, electronic contracts are likely to incorporate advanced tools like blockchain for smart contracts, artificial intelligence for negotiation, and biometrics for enhanced security. Legislative frameworks will need to adapt to these innovations while balancing accessibility, security, and consumer protection.

The ESIGN Act and UETA have paved the way for widespread adoption of electronic contracts, fostering the growth of digital commerce. By addressing key legal challenges and maintaining robust standards, these laws have ensured that electronic agreements are as reliable and enforceable as traditional paper contracts. As the digital landscape continues to transform, these frameworks will play a vital role in shaping the future of legal agreements.